Office of Design
Issue |
|
FDOT spends
$25-$30 million each year repainting existing bridges in
addition to the initial painting costs associated with new steel
bridges.
The use of weathering steel can eliminate the initial and maintenance
costs of painting structures with no reduction in service life when there are no
valid reasons for not allowing weathering steel.
The use of weathering steel should be consistently evaluated as primary
choice for structural steel girders unless there are environmental conditions or
overriding aesthetic considerations.
A more consistent approach in evaluating when steel bridges should be painted
will save money, reduce inconveniences and delays to the traveling public,
reduce a hazardous work condition and eliminate environmental monitoring and
hazardous waste disposal. |
Recommendation |
|
Use weathering
steel for new steel bridges in suitable environments.
Use a single coat of inorganic zinc paint system for extremely aggressive
environments. Where higher
aesthetics are required, use a 3 coat inorganic zinc paint system with clear
coat finish. The use of the 3 coat
system with clear coat finish should be an exception, requiring justification
and approval from the Chief Engineer.
For multi girder bridges where the use of higher level aesthetics has
been approved:
Guidance on the justification for painting and approval from the Chief Engineer for higher aesthetic considerations was developed in Structures Design Bulletin C12-02/Roadway Design Bulletin 12-04 which can be accessed here. Subsequently, this recommendation has been further clarified with Structures Design Bulletin 12-08 which can be accessed here. For questions on the suitability and use of weathering steel, contact Robert Robertson, State Structures Engineer at (850)414-4267. For question on structural steel painting and paint systems, contact Jeff Pouliotte, State Structures Maintenance Engineer at (850)410-5691. |
