Skip Navigation – Go to Main Content
Your browser is currently set to not allow scripting. This site is best viewed with scripting turned on.
Several essential aspects of this site will not function with scripting disabled.

November 7, 2011 -- The Florida Department of Transportation's websites will be unavailable due to data center consolidation and relocation activities, beginning Thursday, November 10, 2011, 6:00 PM (EST). Services should resume by Monday, November 14, 2011 6:00 AM. We apologize for any inconvenience.

FDOT-Construction-Concrete Paving Workshop Agenda
Office of Construction
Pavement Type Selection Workshop

June 23 Bullet Summary  

Summary of Discussion - Rule 14-15.018 Pavement Selection Process and Industry Involvement

As requested during the June 23, 2010 workshop the following synopsis is provided to capture the items of discussion and to provide insight into the direction that might be taken on certain aspects.  This is very preliminary and is an interim step in the process. 
A pre-draft of the document to be incorporated by reference in the rule will be distributed approximately one week before the next workshop.  Any comments you may have on this summary or the pre-draft are to be provided at the July 20th workshop.

The two components of the rule are the economic analysis and the means of obtaining industry input.  As result of the discussion a third aspect surfaced which will not be included in the rule but will be defined, which is how to handle those projects in the pipe line or the "Transition." 

A general philosophy or understanding that grew out of the initial discussion was that the types of projects which require a Pavement Type Selection analysis are the department's major projects.  These projects take several years to develop from the completion of the environmental document to final design and construction which has an overarching effect on the pavement type selection process.
 
1.

1.     Time line

a.     How does the department get input on the analysis - The consensus was to provide both concrete and asphalt industries the analysis as well as the normal advertisement in the Florida Administrative Weekly.  Comments to be due within X weeks (1-4 depending on the project specifics)

b.    When to conduct the Pavement Type Selection Analysis - There was a general consensus that PTS should be completed no later than 30% design.  Concerns were raised that critical information needed to design a pavement might not be available at that time such as soils and water table, and that other actions such as design consultant selection would require the PTS to be completed even earlier in the process. (The impacts of the revised PTS process on other parts of the design process will need further investigation).

c.   Reevaluation of initial PTS analysis or "Decision Check" - Given the majority of the projects under consideration are major and will require an extensive period of time to design there were concerns raised with validity of some of the assumption made in the initial analysis versus information which maybe available prior to construction.  The concept of conducting a "Decision Check" at the 75% stage of design was discussed.  The discussion also gave birth to the need for a process to handle projects that have already advance beyond the 75% design.  This "Transition" process will be handled separate below. 

2.

1.     Types of projects requiring a PTS analysis

The PTS analysis would be conducted on all new construction projects and major reconstruction.  The consensus was that even if the scope of a project did not include widening but did require reconstruction of the pavement and base then a PTS analysis would be conducted.

3.

1.     What are the possible outcomes of the PTS analysis

a.     The selection of one pavement to proceed with final project development based on the analysis

b.   The selection of one pavement to proceed with final project development based on subjective decision considering the analysis and other factors

4.

1.     Life Cycle Analysis

a.     Input Values to be considered-
 
i.   
Discount Rate - While 4% is the current valued used it was suggested to use a number based on the Consumer Price Index and a value specific to each type of pavement

 
ii.   
Rehabilitation strategies
           1.    
How do we address new technology for paving
           2.    
How do we address new materials

 
iii.   
Initial service life
           1.    
How do we address new technology for paving when there is a dearth of project experience
                 with the technology

           2.    
How do we address new materials

 
iv.   
Initial costs

 
v.   
Indirect costs
            1.    
Users costs
            2.    
Utility cuts

 
vi.   
Non pavement costs
            1.    
Design
            2.    
MOT
            3.    
CEI

 
vii.   
Ancillary costs
            1.    
Signs
            2.    
Guardrail

 

5.

1.       Transition

a.       Categories of Projects
i.      Projects with environment approval (NEPA process complete) but are "on the shelf" pending final design    and construction.  These might include projects where funding for design is within the five year work program or not.
ii.      Projects where design is completed and construction is not funded within the five year work program.
iii.      Projects where design is completed and construction is funded within the five year work program.
            1.       Construction programmed in the next year or two
            2.       Construction programmed in the outer years

 

   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

Go Back
Please contact Web Author with any comments,
or call 850-414-4150

 

 

Accessibility | Acronyms | Frequently Asked Questions | Governor's Office | Privacy Policy | Statement of Agency  

Email questions and comments to: 
Public Information Office for General Issues
Web Review Team for Website Issues
Copyright © 1996- Florida Department of Transportation

You might need Word Viewer or Adobe Reader to view file downloads

My Florida logo image  (Opens in New Window)
spacer image